PENGARUH PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (RME TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP N 13 MERANGIN

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Boni Candra
Ferinaldi
Sukur

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out and describe the students' ability to understand mathematical concepts using realistic mathematics education (RME) approach better than conventional learning. The study uses a quantitative approach with an experimental method. The study population was all students of class VIII SMP N 13 Merangin, amounting to four classes with a sample of class VIII C as an experimental class and class VIII B as a control class. The instruments used were test questions on the ability to understand mathematical concepts in the form of essays. The results of the data analysis requirements show that the data of the two sample classes are normally distributed and have homogeneous variances. Hypothesis testing uses the t-test formula. Based on the results of the analysis of research data shows that t arithmetic greater than t table or 2.401> 1.671 on a one-party test. Because t arithmetic> T table then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, so it can be concluded that the ability to understand mathematical concepts using realistic mathematics education (RME) approach is better than conventional learning of students of class VIII SMP N 13 Merangin.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Boni Candra, Ferinaldi, & Sukur. (2019). PENGARUH PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (RME TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP N 13 MERANGIN . Mat-Edukasia, 4(2), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.3020/mat-edukasia.v4i2.231

References

Alhafas. 2015. “Pengaruh Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Kelas VII MTs SMQ Titian Teras”. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Bangko: STKIP YPM
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Dewi, Ratna, dkk. 2008. Model dan Stategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Jakarta. Pustaka Media.
Djarwanto. 2009. Statistik Nonparametrik. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.
Fauzan, Ahmad. 2012. Kemampuan Matematika. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2011. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
Irianto, Agus. 2004. Statistik Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Kencana
Muliyardi. 2002. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika.Padang: UNP
Musdika, Djamarah, dkk. 2011. Model Pembelajaran yang Efektif. Jakarta: Pustaka Media
Negoro & Wijaya. 2008. Kemampuan Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotorik. Jakarta: Pustaka Gramedia
Prawironegoro, Pratikyo. 1985. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Khusus Analisis Soal Untuk Bidang Studi Matematika. Jakarta: Depdikbud
Riduwan. 2013. Belajar mudah penelitian untuk guru –karyawan dan peneliti pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sagala, Syaiful. 2012. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta
Shoimin Aris, 2014 model pembelajaran inovatif. Yogyakarta AR-RUZZ MEDIA
Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Sudjana. 2013. Metode Statistik. Bandung: Tarsito
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
________. 2010. Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
________, 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
________, 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D Bandung: Alfabeta
Suherman, Erman dkk. 2006. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Padang: UPI.
Trihendradi, Cornelius. 2010. Step By Step SPSS16 Analisis Data Statistik. ANDI Yogyakarta.
Walpole, Ronald, E. 1990. Pengantar Statistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.